A Ravenous Ability to Collect Personal Data

Angry Birds, the top-selling paid mobile app for the iPhone in the United States and Europe, has been downloaded more than a billion times by devoted game players around the world, who often spend hours slinging squawking fowl at groups of egg-stealing pigs.
While regular players are familiar with the particular destructive qualities of certain of these birds, many are unaware of one facet: The game possesses a ravenous ability to collect personal information on its users.
When Jason Hong, an associate professor at the Human Computer Interaction Institute at Carnegie Mellon University, surveyed 40 users, all but two were unaware that the game was noting and storing their locations so that they could later be the targets of advertising.
“When I am giving a talk about this, some people will pull out their smartphones while I am still speaking and erase the game,” Mr. Hong, an expert in mobile application privacy, said during an interview. “Generally, most people are simply unaware of what is going on.”
What is going on, according to experts like Mr. Hong, is that applications like Angry Birds and even more innocuous-seeming software, like that which turns your phone into a flashlight, defines words or delivers Bible quotes, are also collecting personal information, usually the user’s location and gender and the unique identification numbers of smartphones. But in some cases, they cull information from contact lists and pictures from photo libraries.
As the Internet goes mobile, privacy issues surrounding phone applications have moved to the front lines of the debate over what information can be collected digitally, when and by whom. Next year, more people around the world will gain access to the Internet through their mobile phones or tablet computers than from traditional desktop personal computers, according to Gartner, the research group.
The shift has brought consumers in the United States, Europe and other parts of the world into a new gray legal area, where existing privacy protections have failed to keep up with the technology. The move to mobile has set off a debate between privacy advocates and online businesses, who consider the accumulation of personal information the backbone of an ad-driven Internet.
In the United States, the data collection practices of application makers are loosely regulated, if at all; some do not even disclose what kind of data they are collecting and why. Last February, the California attorney general, Kamala D. Harris, reached an agreement with six leading operators of mobile application platforms that they would sell or distribute only mobile apps with privacy policies that consumers could review before downloading.
In announcing the voluntary pact with Amazon, Apple, Google, Hewlett-Packard, Microsoft and Research In Motion, whose distribution platforms make up the bulk of the U.S. mobile app market, Ms. Harris noted that most mobile apps came without privacy policies.
“Your personal privacy should not be the cost of using mobile apps, but all too often it is,” Ms. Harris said at the time.
But simple disclosure, in itself, is often insufficient.
The makers of Angry Birds, Rovio Entertainment of Finland, discloses its information collection practices in a 3,358-word policy posted on its Web site. But as with most application makers around the world, the terms of Rovio’s warnings are more of a disclaimer than a choice.
The company advises consumers who do not want their data collected and advertisements to be directed at them to visit the Web site of its analytics firm, Flurry, and to list their details on two industry-sponsored Web sites. But Rovio notes that some companies do not honor the voluntary lists, which are run by the ad industry.
As a last resort, Rovio cautions those who want to avoid data collection or behavioral advertising simply to move on: “If you want to be certain that no behaviorally targeted advertisements are not displayed to you, please do not use or access the services,” according to the company’s policy, last updated Oct. 8.
Despite multiple requests by phone and Internet over five days, Rovio did not respond to questions or offer an interview for this story.
 
Full text and Source:

0 yorum: